$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 865/2024 CM APPL. 38776/2024 CM APPL. 58108/2024 SANJAY YADAV .....Petitioner Through: versus SHRI GYANESH BHARTI COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Hasi Buddin, Adv. for R-5. Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Standing Counsel for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 02.04.2025 1. Counsel for petitioner Ms. Akshaya Jebakumar, seeks to withdraw their vakalatnama. 2. Counsel for MCD states that the appeal by the private respondent (nos. 4-5), before the ATMCD, has been decided and the matter had been remanded back to MCD, to decide the matter afresh, after giving a personal hearing to the private respondent, which is now fixed for 4th April 2025. 3. Accordingly, since the demolition order now stands set aside, the contempt petition would be rendered infructuous, since the directions which were noted by the Court’s order dated 25th April 2023 were that the appeal of respondent nos. 4 and 5 was pending and the Appellate Tribunal may take This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:28:28 requisite steps in that regard. 4. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of. 5. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J APRIL 2, 2025/RK/kp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/04/2025 at 12:28:28