GOLLAPALLI KISHORE KUMAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/3217/2025 · 2025-03-11
S Vishwajith Shetty
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18746 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18746 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10307 CRL.P No. 3217 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3217 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
GOLLAPALLI KISHORE KUMAR REDDY S/O GOLLAPALLI JAYARAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT B BLOCK, G05D DSR FORTUNE PRIME DURGAMMA CHERUVU ROAD MADHAPUR, K.V. RANGAREDDY, TELANGANA - 560 081. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SUDHANVA D.S, ADV.) AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI B.N. JAGADEESH, SPL.P.P)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439(2) CR.PC (FILED U/S 483(3) OF BNSS) PRAYING TO MODIFY THE BAIL CONDITION NO.(e) LAID DOWN BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN CRL.P.NO.387/2025 BY STRIKING IT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Digitally signed by NANDINI MS Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10307 CRL.P No. 3217 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioner, who is accused No.13 in Crime No.118/2024 registered by High Grounds Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 149 of IPC and Section 13(1) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, has filed this petition under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C. with a prayer to relax condition No.(e) imposed by this Court while granting bail to him in Crime No.387/2025 disposed off on
04.02.2025.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a permanent resident of Telangana State and condition No.(e) has been causing untold hardship to him and accordingly, he prays to relax the said condition.
3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor fairly does not oppose the prayer made in the petition.
4. Condition No.(e) imposed in Crl.P.No.387/2025 disposed off on 04.02.2025, reads as follows:-
"e) The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10307 CRL.P No. 3217 of 2025
Court until the case registered against him is
disposed off."
5. Considering the submissions made on both sides, I am of the opinion that the prayer made in the petition needs to be granted. Accordingly, the following order:-
6. The petition is allowed. Condition No.(e) imposed by this Court in Crl.P.No.387/2025 disposed of on 04.02.2025 stands relaxed. All other conditions remain unaltered.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN