Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187458 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD NAUSHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME AFFAIRS CIVIL SECTT. LKO.

/1943/2025 · 2025-12-08

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1943 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 606 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS, P.S.-Gangaghat, District-Unnao. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case. He had applied for issuance of a passport through an agent, who allegedly changed his credentials in the said passport. No offence of forgery has been made against the applicant. Learned AGA opposed the bail application. He submits that both the passports are on record alongwith bail application as Annexure Nos. 5 and 6. The Name, date of birth and address have all been changed for a deliberate purpose, and offence of forgery is clearly made out against the applicant. It is not a false case of implication. Thus, no case for anticipatory bail is made out. Perused the record. A perusal of the copies of both passports are record shows that applicant's name, applicant's father name, applicant's mother name, and his date of birth have all been changed while applying for second passport. Thus, it Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shobhit Kant Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohammad Naushad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Affairs Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) cannot be said that it is a case of false implication. Prima facie commission of offence is made out. It cannot be said applicant has falsely been implicated to injured his reputation. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. December 8, 2025 Vinay/- NABAIL No. 1943 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench