SHUBHAM CHAURASIA @ CHINTU and ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. and ANOTHER
A482/1339/2020 · 2025-12-05
Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1339 of 2020 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard Sri Ramakar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants fairly states that he has no instructions in the matter, at this stage and prays that the present application may be dismissed for want of instructions.
3. Keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the applicants, the present application is dismissed.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. December 5, 2025 Reena/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) Shubham Chaurasia @ Chintu And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench