Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18741 (GAU)

NARESH GOWALA v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/5411/2025 · 2025-09-14

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010198842025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5411/2025 NARESH GOWALA S/O LAKHMAN GOWALA VILL- NO. 1 KALAIGAON, P.O. AND P.S. KALAIGAON, DIST. UDALGURI,ASSAM, PIN NO. 784525 ROLL NO. 5105065296 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-1. 2:THE STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRRMAN BLOCK NO. 12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-03 3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION GUWAHATI ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI- 6 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Page No.# 2/3 CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORC E (RECRUITMENT) EAST BLOCK-07 LEVEL-4 SECXTOR-01 R.K. PURAM NEW DELHI- 66 5:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (DIGP) CRPF CUM- APPELLATE AUTHORITY GROUP CENTRE AMERIGOG GUWAHATI-23. 6:THE PRESIDING OFFICER CT/GD RECRUITMENT EXAMINATION 2025 RECRUITMENT BOARD CRPF AMERIGOG GUWAHATI-23 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD H R AHMED, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 15.09.2025 Heard Md. H.R. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S Baruah, learned CGC for the respondents. 2. The brief fact of this case is that petitioner applied and participated in the recruitment process for the CAPF recruitment for the year 2025. According to the petitioner, his height is 165 CM, however in the physical test examination, his height was recorded as 164.4 CM and he was therefore disqualified as the Page No.# 3/3 minimum height required for Male candidate is 165 CM. 3. Ms. S Baruah, learned CGC appearing for all the respondents submits that in all the other matters, the Co-ordinate Bench had permitted the petitioner therein to file appeal before the appellate authority. 4. The learned counsel for the parties have been heard. Upon careful perusal of the writ petition and on upon due consideration of the submissions made, it is seen that the prayer of the petitioner is that his height which was measured to be 164.4 CM. It is submitted that the petitioner had earlier appeared for the Physical Standard Test (PST) in connection with the Constable (GD) recruitment in CAPFs conducted by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) in the year 2024, wherein his height was officially recorded as 165 cm by the same authority, therefore, it is implausible that the petitioner’s height has decreased from 165 cm to 164.4 cm within a span of approximately one year. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made, this Court is of the view that ends of justice will be met if the writ petition is disposed at this stage by granting 2 (two) weeks time to the petitioner, to prefer an appeal before the competent authority against the rejection of his candidature. If such an appeal is filed within 2 (two) weeks by enclosing a certified copy of this order, the same shall be taken on record and be disposed of by a reasoned order, as expeditiously as possible but not later than 30 (thirty) days from the date of filing of the appeal. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant