HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 31370 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Shivendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy. 2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. Consigned to the records. 5. Mr. Net Ram, learned counsel for respondent no. 4 is present. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivendra Pratap Singh, Adil Aziz Khan, Mubin Ahmad, Zia-Ur Rehman Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kapil Dev Srivastava, Kapil Kr Srivastava, Sandeep Kumar Yadav (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Gaffar Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Minority Welfare And Waqf And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench