HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6980 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Pradeep Agarwal, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Alok Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain defects in the writ petition, therefore, he does not want to press the present petition and seeks liberty to file afresh. 3. The prayer made is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same on record. December 8, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Nirman Sahkariawas Samiti Thru. Secy. Pradeep Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) Civil Judge Senior Division Malihabad Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench