Dr. Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam v. Mrs. Chitralekha Rangabashyam and another
A/923/2025 · 2025-02-28
K Kumaresh Babu
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18739 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18739 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
A NO. 923 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A No. 923 of 2025 Dr. Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam W/o.Mr.Bharath Shetty, No.17, Gilchrist Avenue, Chennai 600
031. Applicant(s) Vs Mrs. Chitralekha Rangabashyam and another Late Prof.N.Rangabashyam, 9/19, Seethamma Colony, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s. Rajagopal Vasudevan R.Murugan M.Sathish M.Ellakkiya P.Tamizh Vendan T.M.Ansel Lewis Charumathi J.L. For Respondent(s): ORDER In a proposed suit seeking declaratory and for a direction, the intending plaintiff seeks leave to sue the second respondent/ defendant before this Court. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. 3.Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the substantial portion of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
the cause of action for the suit arose within the jurisdiction of this Court. 4.Upon considering the above submissions and examining the draft plaint and the affidavit filed in support of this Application, the suit property is situated within the jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, A.No.923 of 2025 is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to sue the respondents/ defendants before this Court. As a corollary, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. Considering the fact that the, leave is granted as prayed for. 28-02-2025 Gba To
1. Mrs. Chitralekha Rangabashyam and another Late Prof.N.Rangabashyam, 9/19, Seethamma Colony, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
2. Chloe Du Cauze De Nazelle Fraser Residence, 31, Patterson Road, Singapore 238 522. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis