HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10155 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all the seven cases in which he was roped and has been granted bail by the court concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in seven cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court concerned. He says that the applicant is not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District- Gonda are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No.325/2024, under Sections- 379, 411 IPC, P.S.-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. (ii) Case Crime No. 477/2024, under Sections -379, 411, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. (iii) Case Crime No.479/2024, under Sections- 379, 411 IPC, P.S.-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. (iv) Case Crime No.414/2024, under Sections- 379, 411 IPC, P.S.-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. (v) Case Crime No.480/2024, under Sections- 379, 411 IPC, P.S.-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. (vi) Case Crime No.481/2024, under Sections- 379, 411 IPC, P.S.-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Pratap Singh, Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kulbhushan Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (vii) Case Crime No. 835/2024, under Section- 3(1) U.P. Gangster Act and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District-Gonda. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. 5. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. 6. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. December 4, 2025 Arun/- A482 No. 10155 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench