HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15102 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 30.04.2024 whereby censure entry was awarded to petitioner. 3. It is submitted that against the impugned order in fact a representation under Rule 25 of Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Police Officers (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 has been filed which is pending consideration. 4. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for final decision with regard to same. 5. In view of innocuous prayer being made, without entering into the merits of case, opposite party No.1, i.e., State of U.P. through Principal Secretary, Home, Civil Secretariat, U.P., Lucknow is directed to decide representation expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon him. Petitioner shall annexe a copy of representation alongwith a certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suyash Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rajnish Tripathi (S.I. Pno-172350167) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench