HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 18909 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 5, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, Surendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Balram Singh, Lakshmipat Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sushil Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Forest Deptt.Civil Sectt. Lko. And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench