Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18735 (AP)

V DHARMA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/17087/2020 · 2025-09-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010259112020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17087/2020 Between: V DHARMA REDDY, FATHER NAME. V KRISHNA REDDY, AGE.45, GUNDELINGUNTA VILLAGE, AKURTHI POST, THOTTEMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. M R JANAKI RAM, S/O LATE RAJA RAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 17-556, PANGAL, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P GANGA RAMI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in directing the Petitioner to attend the Police Station for the purpose of conducting enquiry at the instance of the 6th respondent in absence of any complaint by interfering with the civil dispute and thereby harassing the Petitioner is arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere with the civil dispute pertaining to the Agricultural land of the Petitioner to an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents in Sy.No.268/2B of Panagal Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor District.” 2. Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Police are interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that based on the complaint given by Respondent No.6, the Petitioner was called to the Police Station for preliminary enquiry and that the Police have not interfered in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17087 of 2020 Dt.09.09.2025 Dinesh