Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18733 (AP)

Subbanna @ Subbaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17095/2020 · 2025-09-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010259502020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17095/2020 Between: SUBBANNA @ SUBBAIAH, FATHER NAME LATE MUNUSWAMY, HINDU AGE 65 ADDRESS R/O NERNALLI VILLAGE, BANDARLAPALLE POST, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT). PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT). SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUPPAM RURAL KUPPAM RURAL, RAMAKUPPAM PS, CHITTOOR DIST. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAMAKUPPAM P.S RAMAKUPPAM P.S, RAMAKUPPAM, CHITTOOR DIST. 5. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA, W/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA NERMELLI VILLAGE, BANDARLAPALLE POST, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K S GOPALA KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus direct the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the civil dispute pending between Petitioner and others 2 on one hand and 5th Respondent on the other in respect of the dry land in Sy. No.1200/2 an extent of Ac. 2-10 cents situated in 90 Bandarlapalle Revenue Village in Ramakuppam, Chittoor District by forcing the Petitioner and others to surrender to the terms of 5th Respondent in handing over possession of the aforesaid land as illegal, arbitrary, wrongful, colourable and violative of principles of natural justice.” 2. Sri K.S.Gopala Krishnan, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Police are interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the unofficial Respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17095 of 2020 Dt.09.09.2025 Dinesh