HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4233 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred against alleged non- compliance of order dated 28.03.2025, the same is quoted hereinbelow : "1. Heard. 2. The petitioner claims to have a declaratory decree under Section 229B of the U.P.Z.A&L.R. Act, 1950 and seeks its implementation in the form of recording of his name in the revenue records based on the said decree. 3. However, learned Standing Counsel says that the Gaon Sabha has preferred a revision which is pending though there is no interim order. He says that the decree is executable, but, we express no opinion on his statement. 4. The petitioner may avail the remedies as may be prescribed. It would not be proper for us to interfere in the matter at this stage when the revision is pending, but, this is without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to get the order implemented, if there is no impediment. 5. The petition is disposed of. " 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the representation of the applicant has not been decided as directed by the writ court, hence the respondent is liable to be punished under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, it is found that on 20.06.2025 an order has been passed and communicated to the applicant by taking decision on the representation of the applicant, the same has been enclosed as Annexure No.5 to the contempt application. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has prayed that the present contempt application may be dismissed as infructuous with liberty to the applicant that if he has still any grievance, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Zafar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sanjeeda Parveen .....Applicant(s) Lieutenant General Ram Chander Tiwari (G.O.C. In C) Head Quarter Eastern Command U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 6. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent is hereby discharged. 7. The applicant is at liberty to challenge if he has any grievance, as may be permissible under the law. December 19, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 4233 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench