HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14074 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Jaiyesh Bhoosreddiy, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 3. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that despite the petitioners having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2023 and 30.06.2022, the gratuity as per the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 has not been paid to the petitioners. 4. It is contended that this aspect of the matter has already been considered by this Court in the case of Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Vs. Appellate Authority and Ors passed in Writ-C No. 24841 of 2016 decided on 19.07.2016, a copy of which is annexure 13 to the writ petition. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to submit a representation to the respondent no. 1 within two weeks from today. In case, such a representation is made then the respondent no. 1 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of next six weeks considering the judgment of this Court passed in the case of Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti (supra). 6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. December 5, 2025 Ram Murti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Srivastava, Avadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Surendra Kumar Singh, Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vijai Pal Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) Director Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad U.P. Kisan Mandi Bhawan Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench