Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18730 (AP)

T.Srinivasa Rao v. Joint Secretary (AE) & Director General,

WP/15311/2008 · 2025-08-03

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010259642008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15311/2008 Between: 1. T.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.LATE KRISHNA MURTY PRESIDENT OF MAHARSHI SAMBAMURTY INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (REGD), KAKINADA (MSISDS, KAKINADA) AND CHAIRMAN OF JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN (JAN SIKSHAN SANSTHAN), KAKINADA, ...PETITIONER AND 1. JOINT SECRETARY AE DIRECTOR GENERAL, NATIONAL LITERACY MISSION, DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION AND LITERACY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI. 2. JAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN, DATLAVARI STREET, GANDHINAGAR, KAKINADA -4, REP. BY DIRECTOR (IN CHARGE). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ of Mandamus or any Writ, order or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings in F.No.7-7/2003-AE.8/AE.6, dt. 9.6.2008 basing on the alleged inquiry report dt. 29.10.2007, as illegal, arbitrary, null and void and violative of principles of natural justice and for a consequential order directing the 1st respondent to pay back to the petitioner the full amount of Rs.2,88,032/- (Rupees two lakhs eighty eight thousand and thirty two only) deposited by the petitioner, by 2 setting aside the impugned order F.No.7-7/2003-AE.8/AE.6, dt. 9.6.2008 and to pass such order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 19832 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned order issued by the 1st respondent vide F.No.7-7/2003-AE.8/AE.6, dt. 9.6.2008 and to pass such order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHERUKU RAVINDER RAO 2. SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI ( CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15311/2008 ORDER: When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on both sides submitted that the matter has become infructuous, and therefore, no further orders are required in the present Writ Petition. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 04.08.2025 SCH 4 255 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.15311 OF 2008 Dated:04.08.2025 SCH