Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187296 (ALL)

NANHE v. NAGAR PANCHAYAT KOIRIPUR DISTT. SULTANPUR THRU. CHAIRMAN AND 2 OTHERS

/14151/2025 · 2025-12-09

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14151 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ajay Kumar Singh Raj, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 & 2 and Sri R.S.Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3. The present writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "i) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite party no. 1 and 2, to get joined the petitioner on the post of safai nayak, in the nagar palika Koiripur Sultanpur and provide the pay scale of safai Nayak to the petitioner as per law. (ii) Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding opposite parties no. 3 to consider and decide the application dated 06.11.2025 of the petitioner expeditiously by speaking and reasoned order in stipulated time period, in the interest of justice." Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the opposite parties no. 1 & 2 are not allowing the petitioner to join on the post of 'Safai Nayak' and he has made a representation/application dated 06- 11-2025 before the opposite party no. 3/District Magistrate, Sultanpur, which has not been considered as yet. He submitted that the purpose would suffice if the opposite party no. 3 is directed to take a decision on the application/representation of the petitioner dated 06-11-2025 within the time as prescribed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Tiwari, Neena Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh Raj, C.S.C. Nanhe .....Petitioner(s) Nagar Panchayat Koiripur Distt. Sultanpur Thru. Chairman And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties no. 1 & 2 has vehemently opposed the contentions aforesaid and submitted that the petitioner was never posted on the post of 'Safari Nayak' as only the charge was given thereof and therefore, there would be no claim of the petitioner with respect to the promotion on the post of Safari Nayak. Be that as it may, the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation within the period of 15 days from today while raising all his claims and grievance before the opposite party no. 2/Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Koiripur, District-Sultanpur and if such a representation is made, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14151 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench