RAHUL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/10549/2025 · 2025-12-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10549 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.311 of 2025, under Sections 64, 351(3) of BNS and Sections 3, 4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Satrikkh, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was going towards the Bazar when the applicant misbehaved and took her to a house and committed wrong on her and thereafter ran away. The incident is said to have taken place on 26.06.2025 at 5:00 PM and the FIR was lodged on 27.06.2025 at 3:00 PM. The statement of the victim corroborate the allegation levelled in the FIR. The medical on record does not show any injury either on internal or external part of the victim. The tentative age of the victim is around 18 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the victim was taken from Bazar to a nearby house and wrong was committed and the medical report not indicating any injury and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 27.06.2025, I am of the view that the applicant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sheel Nidhi Shukla, Priya Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Rahul be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10549 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench