SUBHASH CHANDRA GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.CANE DEVELOPMENT LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/9115/2017 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187289 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9115 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishal Singh, Ramesh Chandra Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Puneet Chandra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Subhash Chandra Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Cane Development Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench