HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3371 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy. 2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. Consigned to the records. 5. Mr. Pawan Kumar Pandey, counsel for respondent(s) is present. December 3, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Bagesh Shukla, Neeraj Chaurasiya, Pawan Kumar Pandey, Sharad Pathak (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt Krishnawati Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru Prin Secy Secondary Edu Lko And Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench