Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187286 (ALL)

MOHD. MANZAR ( IN FIR MANZAR) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS

/10995/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10995 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the respondents No.1 to 3. 2. No notice be issued to the respondent No.4 taking in view of nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 10.11.2025 registered as F.I.R. / Case Crime No.0194 of 2025, under Section 109 of B.N.S., P.S. Jayas, District Amethi, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that a bare perusal of the allegations leveled in the F.I.R. would indicate that the petitioner along with another is said to have attacked the complainant on account of which he suffered serious injuries. 5. The contention is that no such incident ever took place and the impugned F.I.R. has been lodged in order to harass the petitioner. 6. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. states on the basis of instructions sent by Shri Rajol Singh, Sub-Inspector, Thana Jayas, District Amethi dated 17.11.2025 that only simple injuries have been caused to the complainant. It is further stated that the investigation in the matter is still going on. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Manzar ( In Fir Manzar) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. The aforesaid statement is recorded. 8. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner till any credible evidence emerges against him. 9. It is needles to mention that the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation, failing which, protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. November 20, 2025 S. Shivhare CRLP No. 10995 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench