Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187283 (ALL)

VINOD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/11743/2025 · 2025-12-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11743 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 183 of 2025, under sections 64(1), 127(2), 351(3) BNS, P.S. Itaunja, District Lucknow. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 20.9.2025 when the informant was sitting in front of her home the applicant came and took her to a nearby place and committed wrong on her. The FIR was lodged after three days on 23.9.2025. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS the victim stated that she was taken to a separate place. It was also stated that her child was sleeping at the home from where the applicant had taken her. The tentative age of the victim is around 25 years. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that the FIR was lodged after delay of three days without explanation, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 26.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Roshan Babu Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant Vinod be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 5, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11743 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench