HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 19629 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 8, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rayees Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., C.B. Singh, Madan Gopal Tripathi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Km. Mehraj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Deptt.Of Basic Edu.Govt.Of Up And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench