IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10552 of 2025 Decided on: 3rd July, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ram Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and respondent No.5, respectively. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:- “i. That the respondents may be ordered to process the case of the petitioner in the light of the order passed by 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No.6309 of 2017, Sunder Singh Vrs. State of H.P. and others and the petitioner may be granted pension w.e.f. 1.1.2018 with all benefits incidental thereof.” 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 03, 2025 Judge Mukesh