NURUDDEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/9665/2024 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187246 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187246 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9665 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. No one appears on behalf of the applicant even in the revised list. Learned A.G.A. as well as Sri Ramakar Shukla, learned Counsel for the complainant is present.
2. Learned Counsel for the complainant informs that the trial has already been concluded and the applicant has been acquitted.
3. In view thereof, the application is rendered infructuous.
4. It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. November 20, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Mohan Sahai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Nuruddeen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench