Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187242 (ALL)

SHASHI PAL RAO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. SECDY. EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/12492/2025 · 2025-12-08

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12492 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for appearing for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the prayer clause no. 1 of the writ petition. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. In view of the aforesaid, the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed and prayer no. 1 of the writ petition is hereby struck off and the prayer nos. (ii), (iii),(iv) and (v) are repositioned as prayer nos. (i) to (iv) in the writ petition. This shall be incorporated by the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh,learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and persued the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondents to transfer the Petitioner from Shri Kedarnath Intermediate College, Teghna, Mau to Maharaja Agrasen Inter College Deoria or Manas College, Fatehpur, Deoria in accordance with the guidelines adhered in the Government Order dated 07.06.20 as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Additional Director, Secondary Education, Directorate of Education, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishabh Kapoor, Krishna Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shashi Pal Rao .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Secdy. Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/Additional Director, Secondary Education, Directorate of Education, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 8, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12492 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench