Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187240 (ALL)

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION SECTT. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

/7023/2025 · 2025-12-08

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7023 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Mr. Ramesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Ms. Seema Dixit, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought the issuance of a direction to the UP Lok Ayukt to decide the petitioner's complaint which is pending since 17.03.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the Up-Lok Ayukt has stated that upon the petitioner's complaint, a report was sought from the Directorate of Pension whereof three members' committee was constituted for submitting the report but no report has yet been received in the office of UP Lok Ayukt and, therefore, Up-Lok Ayukt is unable to proceed with the matter. 4. On the basis of oral instructions, Ms. Sheela Singh, learned Standing Counsel has informed that the inquiry has been completed and report will be forwarded to the office of UP Lok Ayukt within a period of one week. 5. In such circumstances, the petition stands disposed off by directing the State to forward the inquiry report to the office of Up-Lok Ayukt, UP who will take appropriate action in the matter, accordingly. December 8, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Singh, Himanshu Deepak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amarendra Pratap Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Satyendra Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Sectt. Lko. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench