VEERENDRA KUMAR DUBEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. / ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF AYUSH LKO. AND ANOTHER
/13256/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187233 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187233 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13256 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide retiral benefits to petitioner counting the daily wage services rendered by him prior to regularization i.e. on 02.04.2012.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that his case is completely covered by judgment rendered by this Court in Jai Ram Sharma v. State of U.P. and others [WRIT - A No. - 731 of 2024].
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. Principal Secretary/Additional Chief Secretary U.P., Department of Ayush, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order in light of aforesaid judgment, in case the same is applicable, within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
5. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 20, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Veerendra Kumar Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. / Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench