Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18722 (JHR)

JAVED ANSARI ALIAS JAVED ANSARI ALIAS MD JAVED ANSARI ALIAS JAVE MIYAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4007/2025 · 2025-08-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:22119 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 4007 of 2025 1. Javed Ansari @ Md. Javed Ansari @ Java Miya, age about 25 years, son of Mohammad Murtaja 2. Manober @ Manowar Ansari @ Manowar Alam, age about 45 years, son of Md. Murtaza 3. Junaid Miyan @ Md. Junaid Ansari @ Juned Ansari, age about 18 years, son of Mohammad Murtaja 4. Tamzid Miyan @ Tamjid Ansari, age about 24 years, son of Mahful Ali 5. Murtaz @ Murtaza Miyan,@ Md. Murtaza, age about 57 Years, Son of Amir Hemja, 6. Mahafuz Miyan,@ Md. Mahafuj, age about 47 Years, Son of Amir Hemja, 7. Hafiz Miyan,@Hafij Ansari, age about 49 years, Son of Amir Hemja, 8. Rakib Miyan,@ Rakib Ansari, age about 40 Years, Son of Amir Hemja 9. Hasib Miyan,@ Abdul Hasib, age about 34 Years, Son of Amir Hemja, All Resident of village- Rajabhita, P.O - Koridih-2, P.S. Narayanpur District Jamtara. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. K.K. Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P. ……….. 06/ 06.08.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025, registered under sections 119 (2) (3)/190/126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/74/303(2) 352/351(2) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 09 of the petition. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and on the same day case has been registered against the informant side. He submits that scuffle has taken place with regard to removal of the road breaker. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault. 5. Considering that petitioners are having no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 09 of the petition and there is case and counter case between the parties, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners above named, are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- ( 2025:JHHC:22119 ) (twenty five thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Jamtara, in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-