Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18722 (CHH)

HARI PRASAD PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1159/2023 · 2025-09-17

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:47993-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1159 of 2023 1. Hari Prasad Pandey S/o Sheshman Pandey Aged About 60 Years Resident of Village Passan, Tahsil Podi-Uproda, District - Korba Chhattisgarh. 2. Rajkumar Pandey S/o Hari Prasad Pandey Aged About 32 Years Resident Of Village Passan, Tahsil Podi-Uproda, District - Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station, Passan, District - Korba Chhattisgarh. 2. Harikishan Binjhwar S/o Late Moharsai Binjhwar Aged About 52 Years Resident Of Village Passan, Tahsil -Podi-Uproda, District - Korba Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Khare, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. [ Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. Aditya Khare, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Swajeet Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No. 1/State. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.09.19 10:20:51 +0530 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the impugned FIR No. 179 of 2022 registered at Police Station – Passan, District Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 294, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the trial in the present matter has already concluded and that the petitioners have been acquitted by the learned trial Court. In light of this development, it is submitted that the present petition has rendered infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan