HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 827 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has become infructuous as the same has lost its efficacy. 2. In view of aforesaid statement given by counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. Consigned to the records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Kr Singh Suryvanshi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Sudhir Kumar Mishra And Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Rural Development Lko And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench