HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 138 of 2025 Danish and others ..….....Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav , Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Latwal, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicants Danish, Sahil and Rohit Kumar alias Guddu seek anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No.32 of 2025, dated 02.02.2025, under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 01.02.2025, police recovered beef and other articles from a place, but the applicants and the co-accused managed to escape. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that nothing was recovered from the possession of the applicants; they have been implicated merely based on the statement of the co-accused. 2 5. Learned State counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that the co-accused was arrested on the spot and he disclosed the names of the applicants as the persons, who were also involved in the case. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 8. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned. In addition to it, the applicants shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) They shall cooperate with the investigation. 3 (iii) The applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicants shall deposit their passports with the AO. The passports may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If any of the applicants does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 13.02.2025 Sanjay