CRWP-4165-2025 IN THE HIGH CO (141) HARMAN KAUR A STATE OF PUNJA CORAM: HON'B Present: Mr. Anu Mr. Ruc MANISHA BATRA 1. The pre Constitution of India respondents No.2 and of respondents No 08.04.2026 (Annexur 2. At the v that the petitioners ha 5) before the Senior mentioned in the pre action has been tak petitioners would be No.2-Senior Superi representation filed b 2025 (O&M) (1) H COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR
CRW Dat AUR AND ANOTHER Versus
UNJAB AND OTHERS ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISH r. Anureet S. Sidhu, Advocate for the r. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, P ****
ATRA, J. (ORAL) he present petition has been filed f India seeking issuance of a writ of m o.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty s No.4 to 9 and to take action o nnexure P-5). t the very outset, learned counsel for ners have recently filed a representatio Senior Superintendent of Police, Patia he present petition but the same has n en taken thereon. He further subm uld be satisfied if appropriate direct Superintendent of Police, Patiala filed by the petitioners and take necess HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4165-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 10.04.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents NISHA BATRA
or the petitioners AG, Punjab filed under Article 226 of the it of mandamus directing the official liberty of the petitioners at the hands tion on their representation dated sel for the petitioners has submitted entation on 08.04.2026 (Annexure P- Patiala raising their grievances as has not yet been considered and no submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to respondent Patiala to decide the aforesaid necessary action thereon.
the ficial ands ated itted - es as d no , the dent esaid AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.10 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4165-2025 3. Notice o 4. Ms. Ru behalf of the respon course. Let a comple the day. 5. In view commenting anythin at this stage with representation dated of 15 days from to Needless to say, if a would provide them
10.04.2026 Amit Sharma 2025 (O&M) (2) otice of motion. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, respondents-State and submits that th omplete set of the paperbook be suppl view of the limited prayer made nything on the merits of the case, the with a direction to respondent N dated 08.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) of om today, by passing a speaking or y, if any threat is found to the petitio them adequate security in order to pro (MANI Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
  
DAG, Punjab has advance notice on hat the needful will be done in due supplied to her during the course of made by the petitioners, without e, the present petition is disposed of ent No.2 to decide the aforesaid f the petitioners within a period ing order in accordance with law. petitioners, the official respondents to protect their life and liberty. ANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
es/No
e on due se of thout ed of esaid eriod law. dents AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.10 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.