APHC010376752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 19381/2025 Between: 1. BODIKE LAXMI DEVI, W/O. LATE RAMA KRISHNA AGED 46 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O. NANDYALAMPETA VILLAGE, S MIDUKURU MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, AT KADAPA 3. THE TAHSILDAR, S MIDUKURU MANDAL YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent cancelling the assignment without giving any opportunity to the petitioner for hearing and defending, and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his assigned agriculture land admeasuring Ac. 1.61 cents in Sy No. 854/1 of Nandyalampeta Village, 2 S Midukuru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional. and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to dispossess the petitioner from his agriculture land admeasuring Ac. 1.61 cents in Sy No. 854/1 of Nandyalampeta Village, S Midukuru Mandal, YSR Kadapa District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 19.08.2025 passed in WP.No.19381 of 2025 and also dismiss the writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NEELAM SANKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 08.05.2026 NNN