VISHWANATH SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.EDU.GOVT. OF U.P. CIVIL SECTT. andORS.
WRIA/21409/2016 · 2025-12-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187143 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187143 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 21409 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Kumar Srivastava, Nirmit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vishwanath Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Edu.Govt. Of U.P. Civil Sectt. Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench