Liyakat Ali v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. REVENUE LUCKNOW AND ORS.
/11569/2025 · 2025-12-04
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187126 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187126 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11569 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Sri Muzzamil Asad holding brief of Sri Ashok Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of certain defects that have crept in the writ petition, he does not want to press the writ petition and he seeks liberty to file fresh petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. December 4, 2025 Pradeep/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar, Chandra Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Liyakat Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Revenue Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench