1 2025:CGHC:18263-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1368 of 2025 1 - Ashish Bajpai S/o Shri Ashok Narayan Aged About 63 Years R/o Flat No.-101, Sundar Nagar, Purani Basti, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Jaya Bajpai W/o Ashish Bajpai Aged About 58 Years R/o Flat No.- 101, Sundar Nagar, Purani Basti, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Mrs. Soumya Bajpai Jain W/o Shubham Jain Aged About 30 Years R/o Flat No.-101, Sundar Nagar, Purani Basti, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Kumari Tanya Bajpai D/o Ashish Bajpai Aged About 25 Years R/o Flat No.-101, Sundar Nagar, Purani Basti, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer , Police Station - Purani Basti, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mayur Nirmal S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Nirmal Aged About 32 Years R/o New Changorabhatha, Raipur (C.G.), (Complainant In The Instant Crime) 3 - Vinod Singh Thakur S/o Shri Rajendra Singh Thakur Aged About 44 Years R/o New Changorabhatha, Raipur (C.G.), (Complainant In The Instant Crime) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 23.04.2025 1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Heard Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Government Advocate for the respondents No.1 / State. 3. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It, is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and consequently quash the F.I.R. no. 05/2025 registered with the P.S. Purani Basti, Raipur (C.G.) by the Respondent No. 1 on 04.01.2025, in the interest of justice. And/or any other relief/ relief's which this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may please be also granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice.” 4. From perusal of the relief prayed for in the present petition, it transpires that the same is a defective one as the counsel for the petitioners has not mentioned the particulars of the FIR with respect to the offences under which it has been registered and he has only drafted a vague and sketchy prayer. 5. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to 3 withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings. 6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioners in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Home for Mentally Underdeveloped Children, Mana Camp, District- Raipur (C.G.). 7. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 8. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same, subject to deposit of the fine amount. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet