Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187096 (ALL)

CHANDRA DEI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/7004/2025 · 2025-12-03

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7004 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sobh Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ramsanehi Ghat, District - Barabanki, to decide Mutation Case No. 4478 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T 202204120204487) - Chandra Dei Vs. Darshan, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ramsanehi Ghat, District - Barabanki, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Ramsanehi Ghat, District - Barabanki, is directed to decide Mutation Case No. 4478 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T 202204120204487) - Chandra Dei Vs. Darshan, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 3, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shobh Nath Yadav, Jitendra Bahadur Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Chandra Dei .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench