Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18709 (RAJ)

MOHAMMED RUSTAM MANSURI S/O KADAR KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

/1302/2025 · 2025-05-21

Uma Shanker Vyas

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1302/2025 Mohammed Rustam Mansuri S/o Kadar Khan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Nai Abadi Mishroli Police Station Mishroli District Jhalawar(Raj)(At Presnet Confined In District Jail Jhalawar(Raj) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Kalabai W/o Amarlal, R/o Nai Abadi Mishroli Police Station Mishroli District Jhalawar(Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/05/2025 Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the report wherein, it has been mentioned that victim/complainant(s) has been informed. The same is taken on record. Despite that, no one is present on behalf of the victim/complainant(s). Thus, service is treated as complete. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘the Act of 1989’) has been filed in connection with FIR No.40/2025 registered at Police Station Mishroli, District Jhalawar for the offence under Section(s) 126(2), 115(2) & 117(2) of BNS and under Section(s) 3-2(va) of the Act of 1989. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-appellant has been in judicial [2025:RJ-JP:21396] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-1302/2025] custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence prays for his release on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. The order dated 23.04.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Jhalawar (Rajasthan) is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. It is directed that accused appellant Mohammed Rustam Mansuri S/o Kadar Khan shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so and shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C./480(3) BNSS. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /255