IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4428 of 2024 ------ Adnan Adil, aged about 31 years, son of Md. Salahuddin, resident of New Ramzan Colony, Naya Bazar, Dhanbad, near Shiv Mandir, P.O. Dhanbad, P.S. Bankmore, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. . .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shaheen Praveen wife of Adnan Ali, daughter of Afzal Ansari, presently residing at Raja Bazar, near Urdu Mazlish, P.O. and P.S. Bokaro Thermal, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Ms. Bandana Sinha, Addl. P.P For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Advocate Mr. Rohit Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Ujjwal Jaipuriar, Advocate ------ Order No.03 Dated- 18-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No.28 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.307 of 2024 instituted under Sections 498A, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the informant/opposite party No.2, treated her with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that because of some marital discord, this false case has been foisted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to keep and maintain the opposite party No.2 with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife if and when she resumes conjugal life with him. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the opposite party No.2 in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State being assisted by the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.25,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.- 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Bokaro Thermal P.S. Case No.28 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.307 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will keep and maintain the opposite party No.2 with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife if and when she resumes conjugal life with him and he will not annoy or disturb her in any manner during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/