SMT. SIYADULARI v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.
BAIL/10857/2025 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187089 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187089 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10857 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 256 of 2025 under sections 80(2), 85 BNS and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Rupaideeha, District Bahraich.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to son of the applicant three years ago, subsequently, due to matrimonial dispute, the daughter of the informant had killed for dowry. The cause of death is ante-mortem hanging. The applicant is mother-in-law of the daughter of the informant is having a separate living with her husband and has no concern with her previous husband and his son.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances including the post-mortem report, there being nothing specific is found against the applicant, and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant, who is in jail since 02.09.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Smt. Siyadulari be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Siyadulari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 15, 2025 Raj BAIL No. 10857 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench