SHANTI DEVI (MAJOR B.C.) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAILC/32/2022 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187080 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 187080 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 32 of 2022 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
2. The present bail cancellation has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused on 26.08.2021.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that after the grant of bail, the accused are not co-operating with the trial.
4. Considering the submission of the Counsel for the applicant and the fact that substantial time has elapsed and there being no material to suggest any good ground to cancel the bail at this stage, the bail cancellation application is rejected. However, the trial court is directed to make earnest efforts conclude the trial expeditiously without giving any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. November 15, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Yadav, Shiv Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Paritosh Shukla, Sukh Deo Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Shanti Devi (Major B.C.) .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench