- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22010 WP No. 7226 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 7226 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M RAJASHEKAR S/O LATE S MALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2. SRI RUDRAMUTHY M. S/O LATE S MALLAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS SL.NO.1 & 2 BOTH ARE R/AT THAMMARASANAHALLI VILLAGE T B POST, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI YALAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU - 560 089. 3. SRI SHIAPRASAD K., S/O LATE KOTRABASAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT NO. 867, 11TH 'A' CROSS AGBG LAYOUT, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD CHIKKABANAVARA, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI YALAHANKA TALUK BENGALURU - 560 090. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22010 WP No. 7226 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT O REVENUE M S BUILDINGS DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTNT COMMISSINOER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR YALAHANKA TALUK YELAHANKA BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ENTER THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS NO.1 AND 2 IN RESPECT OF LAND MEASURING I ACRES EACH AS PER MR.NO.9/2004-05 AND MR.NO.6/2005-06 RESPECTIVELY AND THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER NO.3 IN RESPECT OF THE LAND MEASURING 0-20 GUNTAS AS PER MR.NO.T8/2021-22 IN THE RTC OF NEW SY.NO.33 THAMMARASANAHALLI VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI YALAHANKA TALUK BY DELETING THEIR NAMES AND EXTENT IN SY.NO.10 OF THE SAID THAMMARASANAHALLI VILLAGE AS PRAYED IN THE APPEAL IN RA(YLK) NO.347/2024-25 BY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22010 WP No. 7226 of 2025 PASSING THE NECESSARY ORDER IN THE SAID APPEAL IN RA(YLK). NO.347/2024-25 AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, petitioners have approached the respondent No.2 under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 in Appeal No. RA(YLK) NO.347/2024-25, praying to enter the names of the petitioner in the RTC in respect of the land in question. In this regard, learned counsel submitted that the aforesaid appeal is pending consideration before the respondent No.2 and the matter has been set down for pronouncement of the order, however, the same has not been done by the respondent No.2. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22010 WP No. 7226 of 2025 4. In that view of the matter, without interfering with the merits of the case, respondent No.2 is directed to pass appropriate order in Appeal No. RA(YLK) NO.347/2024-25, at the earliest, within outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36