Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010197792025
2025:GAU-AS:12293
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2917/2025 BHUPESH PATHAK S/O LT MANOHAR PATHAK, R/O- HOUSE NO. 24, SHREENAGAR MAIN ROAD, CHRISTIANBASTI, P.O. DISPUR, GUWAHATI 05, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI 781036 ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP (M) GUWAHATI 781036 ASSAM 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE KAMRUP (M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U S BORA, MR S BORTHAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPT
Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/5965/2024 MANOMOTI PATHAK W/O- LATE MANOHAR PATHAK R/O- HOUSE NO. 24 SHREENAGAR MAIN ROAD CHRISTIAN BASTI P.O. DISPUR GUWAHATI-05 DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) GUWAHATI-781036 ASSAM 3:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KAMRUP(M) GHY-781036 ASSAM 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER DISPUR REVENUE CIRCLE KAMRUP(M) ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR S BORTHAKUR Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 10-09-2025 Heard Mr. U. S. Bora, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. S. Roy, learned Government Advocate for the State and Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue. 2. This is an application seeking substitution of the name of the petitioner, namely, Manomoti Pathak, in WP(C) No. 5965/2024, who has reportedly expired on 02.03.2025, by her legal heir. 3. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and the prayer for substitution of the petitioner not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents and also considering that the petitioner has expired during the pendency of the writ petition, I deem it appropriate to allow this writ petition by allowing the applicant to be substituted as being a legal heir. 4. Accordingly, the applicant, namely, Bhupesh Pathak, Age - 55 years, S/o- Lt Manohar Pathak, R/o- House No. 24, Shreenagar Main Road, Christian Basti, P.Ο.
Dispur, Guwahati -05, Dist-Kamrup (M), Assam, being the legal heir of the petitioner, is allowed to be substituted as the petitioner in WP(C) No. 5965/2024. 5. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant