Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 187065 (ALL)

AZAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/7886/2024 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7886 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant was enlarged on bail vide order 29.07.2024 with direction to match the DNA sample of the applicant to the newly born child. As per the DNA report, the applicant is not the biological father of the child. 3. In view thereof, the interim bail granted to the applicant vide order dated 29.07.2024 is confirmed till conclusion of the trial on the same terms and conditions. 4. The application is allowed. November 20, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Azad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench