Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186998 (ALL)

KAILSH CHANDRA SAINI AND 66 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14901/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14901 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri P.K. Singh, learned counsel for the State and Shri Vikas Kumar Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 & 4, whose vakalatnama filed today is taken on record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(i)To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to grant grade pay Rs. 1800 in light of Government order dated 08.09.2010, contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party No. 1 to take a decision on representation of the petitioners' dated 23.12.2022, contained as Annexure No. 5 to this writ petition within specific time framed by this Hon'ble Court. (iii) To pass such other lorder. or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems it fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (iv) To allow the writ petition with costs in favour of the petitioners." 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioners to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : M.P. Raju Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ratnesh Chandra, Vikas Kumar Agrawal Kailsh Chandra Saini And 66 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) move a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 and he may be directed direct to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioners to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.1 ventilating their grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with them enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose off the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14901 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench