SHRI. VIJAY KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT. TELECOMUNICATION MINISTRY OF COMM. NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/13958/2025 · 2025-12-03
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186992 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13958 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3, Mr. Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the Opposite Party no.3 ie., Additional General Manager (MSP-UP), Im Bhawan, TC/18V, Vibhuti Khand, Gomtinagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh forthwith make payment of interest on current market rate on the amount paid in favour of the petitioner by the opposite party no.3 towards Privilege Leave Encashment from the date of retirement of the petitioner Le.31.07.2021 till the actual payment of the said amount Rs.9.71.731/-dated 02.12.2024 with updated interest 18% from the date of retirement of the petitioner.
ii. Award the writ petition with cost." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation claiming the interest on Privilege Leave Encashment and the respondent no. 3 may be
directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avinash Singh, Abhinav Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Dwijendra Mishra Shri. Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Telecomunication Ministry Of Comm. New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days claiming the interest on Privilege Leave Encashment, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no.3/Additional General Manager/Unit Head(M) ITI Ltd, Lucknow, shall consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 3, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13958 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench