HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11059 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Niteesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Anil Kumar Kushwaha, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have challenged the validity of an award dated 04.12.2023, passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Lucknow. 3. An order passed by the labour court would be amenable to the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the labour court should not be impleaded as an opposite party to the petition. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the petition due to aforesaid defects and he seeks liberty to file a petition under the appropriate provision. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Let the certified copy of the judgement annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining its photocopy on record. November 15, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Niteesh Kumar, Gaurav Gunjan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) M/S Hitachi Home And Life Solutions (I) Ltd. Lko. Thru. Branch Manager And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Presiding Officer Labour Court U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench