Chittu v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP(MD)/13002/2025 · 2025-11-25
B Pugalendhi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186969 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186969 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP.(MD)No.13002 of 2025 Crl.OP(MD)No.13002 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI, J., This Criminal Original Petition is listed today under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance of the State. 2.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), the prosecution case is that 87 grams of gold ornaments were found missing, for which, an FIR in Crime No.87 of 2024 has been registered. However, in the order copy, it has been referred to as 87 sovereigns, instead of 87 grams. Therefore, he prayed for appropriate orders. 3.This Court has perused the FIR in Crime No.87 of 2024 and the affidavit filed by the petitioner in Crl.OP(MD)No.13002 of 2025. In the FIR, the quantity has been referred as 87 grams, whereas, in the affidavit, it has been referred as 87 sovereigns grams. 4.Heard the petitioner's Counsel with respect to the aforesaid anomaly. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.(MD)No.13002 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI,J., gk 5.Registry is directed to replace '87 sovereigns' as '87 grams' in paragraph no.20 of the common order dated 25.11.2025 and issue fresh order copy to the parties concerned. The fresh order copy shall also be updated in the official website. 27.03.2026 gk Crl.OP(MD)No.13002 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis