HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15190 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vijay Vikram Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 5 and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the gratuity to the petitioner for the period he worked on the daily wage basis from 1988 till regularization of his services on 20.05.2012, along with the interest at the rate of 18% per annum till the date of actual payment of gratuity; (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay compensation for the hardship caused to the petitioner and the litigation expenses incurred by him; (iii) to issue a writ, grant such other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the present case; and (iv) award the costs of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Narain Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surendra Kumar Singh Arendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Deptt. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 10 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Director, Rajya Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, U.P. Lucknow, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 15190 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench